Machine Safeguarding Philosophies
A guard should:
- Preferably be a built-in feature
- Provide for machine oiling, inspection, adjustment and repair
- Last as long as the machine
- Resist normal wear and shock
- Not constitute a hazard itself
- Provide against contingencies, not just normal operations.
- Provide positive protection
- Prevent ALL access to the danger zone
- Cause the operator No discomfort
- Not interfere with production
- Operate automatically or with minimum effort
- Be designed for the job and the machine
A guard has but one purpose, that purpose is to protect someone from contact with a point of danger. Any guard that does not do this fails its purpose.
Common sense does NOT allow one to recognize:
- The Hazard
- The Risk
- The Gravity of the Risk
- The "Unreasonableness" of the Risk
- The Safety Engineering Alternative
- It is impossible for a worker to keep his mind on what he is doing 100% of the time
- Inattention is a major cause of injuries
- Hazards should be eliminated if possible
- Efficient guards can prevent incidents
- The perfect guard will function regardless of anything the operator might do
- Designers, suppliers, and users have a duty to provide safe machinery
- The injury or death could have been avoided
- To err is human - to forgive design
- Inadvertence is not negligence
- Common sense may actually cause injuries